Skip to content

Unfortunate Fortune: Shockingly Pathetic Stock Picks from 2000

It’s Fortune magazine, August 2000, Special Investors Issue, Retire Rich

Article: 10 Stocks to Last the Decade

And here’s the list:

Stock Ticker Price P/E Comment
Broadcom BRCM $237 255 Maker of chips used in the next generation of entertainment devices
Charles Schwab SCH $36 56 Former discount broker that has grown up along with its boomer clients
Enron ENE $73 51 Biggest online broker for coal, oil, and gas; next up — broadband
Genentech DNA $150 128 Offers a huge pipeline of promising drugs, plus a topflight sales force
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter MWD $89 18 Just passed Goldman Sachs as the top M&A firm in the world
Nokia NOK $54 75 Mobile-phone maker now moving into “smart” appliances
Nortel Networks NT $77 114 75% of U.S. Internet Traffic travels through its equipment
Oracle ORCL $74 86 Onetime database firm that has become an e-commerce must-own
Univision UVN $113 122 Biggest Spanish-language TV programmer in the country
Viacom VIA $69 96 Owns a stable of media brands like CBS, MTV, and Paramount Pictures

 1 share of each = $972.

Where are they now?:

Stock Ticker Price P/E Comment
Broadcom BRCM $28 68 Stock split in 2006
Charles Schwab SCHW $22 11 Delisted from the NYSE, moved to NASDAQ.
Enron ECSPQ $0.08 0.35 Bankrupt. Trading Over the Counter
Genentech DNA $70 24 Split twice, once right after the article was written and again in 2004
Morgan Stanley MS $47 27 Caught up on mortgage meltdown, bailed out by a Chinese company
Nokia NOK $29 10 Traded as low as $11 a share
Nortel Networks NT $8 - Fell on hard times immediately following the article. Did 1:10 reverse split in 2006. So you can think of the stock as 80 cents.
Oracle ORCL $22 22 Split soon after the article. Hit a low of $8.
Univision - - - Taken private at $36 / share
Viacom
CBS
VIA
CBS
$39
$23
14
13
Viacom split its shares into the tangled mess of VIA, VIA.B, CBS, CBS.B

Of the ten companies, the only one that would have made money over the past eight years was Genentech. Your shares would now be worth $506, a 48% loss. Without the admirable help of Genentech, the loss would have been 64%. Somehow it feels a lot worse than that though, considering that you would have lost everything on Enron and virtually everything on Nortel. Of course, the majority of people sold at or near the bottoms, fairing even worse. Mathematically speaking, the bottom is generally caused by increased selling. Nice picks.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Google
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • TwitThis
  • Furl
  • Smarking

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*